Refine
Document Type
- Report (2)
- Article (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Language
- English (4) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (4)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (4) (remove)
Keywords
- Artificial Intelligence in Education (2)
- Learning Analytics Dashboard (2)
- Natural Language Processing (2)
- Ontologies (2)
- e-Portfolios (2)
- Adorno (1)
- Mehrsprachigkeit, Einstellungen, Lehrer, teachers’ beliefs, teaching strategies, teaching implementation, linguistic diversity, multilingualism, Germany, Sweden, Chile, Grade 4 (1)
- Merleau-Ponty (1)
- Negativity (1)
- Philosophy (1)
Institute
- Pädagogische Hochschule Weingarten (4) (remove)
In this report, we present a system architecture and technical infrastructure that allows for a seamless integration of a standard e-portfolio platform, suitable AI-based tool chains, and interactive dashboard applications for students and teachers. This is followed by a description of how the architecture's components interact in a typical analysis workflow. Furthermore, we examine the development of an integrated knowledge architecture for guiding the semantic analysis of e-portfolios considering two different knowledge resources. The proposed architecture is the first draft of an AI-supported e-portfolio analysis system to be used in real-life scenarios at the University of Education in Weingarten.
This report provides an in-depth analysis of the state-of-the-art research and technologies of e-portfolio analysis, and elicit the current situation and the needs of students and teachers in the context of e-portfolios in higher education. It summarizes the results of this problem and context analysis within the AISOP project and builds the foundation for developing a user-centred tool infrastructure for AI-based e-portfolio analysis.
In this text, I will give an example of philosophy as transformative practice. What happens when we fully understand the limitations of our knowledge? How can we describe the transformative potential when we realize that we somehow, as Kant and Lyotard put it, find ourselves on an island of knowledge in the middle of no-knowledge? This is the issue raised by several contemporary philosophers, such as Wittgenstein, Adorno, or Merleau-Ponty.
Globalization has not only changed our society, it has also had a profound effect on education. Many schools deal with student populations which, due to migration, are increasingly multilingual. Politically, few argue against the importance of multilingualism; rather, it is promoted. However, in practical terms the challenges associated with teaching and educational policies have increased as a result of linguistic diversity among student bodies. Moreover, reading is certainly regarded as a key learning skill, but how is the students’ life-world multilingualism (LWMUL) taken into consideration? Previous research suggests that there are significant links between teachers’ beliefs and practices, making this a compelling issue. The overall aim of this study was thus to gain a deeper understanding on teachers’ beliefs and strategies when teaching reading in multilingual settings. Using a cross-disciplinary, qualitative research methodology approach, the empirical inquiry consists of case studies with different, linguistically diverse settings. The case studies include classroom observations as well as teacher interviews in German, Swedish and Chilean grade 4 classrooms. After a qualitative content analysis in three analysis procedures, the results suggest dualistic beliefs being exhibited by the teachers. The separation of languages is believed to be of major importance, thus providing space almost exclusively for the academic language of instruction. This is reflected in the teachers’ strategies, leading to a static implementation, in which the students’ life-world multilingual resources (MULR) are generally not included. A lack of professional competence could be observed in issues regarding multilingualism, allowing beliefs rather than evidence-based knowledge to be the deciding factor in the practice. Four types of strategies for teaching reading in multilingual settings were identified, and an inattentive type of strategy, including a blindness to difference, seems to dominate.